Legal Opinion
Pittston Co. v. Allianz Insurance
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 25, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 90-3631PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BACKGROUND. 1288
DISCUSSION... 1292
1. The Summary Judgment Standard <M oí <N1 1 — I
2. The Travelers CGL Policies.
A Voluntary Assumption of an Obligation. 1293
B. Damages .
C. The Continuous Trigger.
D. “Expected nor Intended” as an Element of Coverage. 1300
E. Defenses to Coverage.(i) Late Notice and Defense Costs. 1311(ii) Pollution Exclusion Clause.(in) Owned Property Exclusion. 1316
P. The Fortuity, Known Loss and Loss m Progress Doctrines t-H CO
G. Summary.
3.The Other Insurers. 1318
A. CMLP Policies. 1318
B. The Protective Insurance Company’s Motion. 1327
C. The Insurance Company…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- No. 93-5777, 93-5794Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Admiral InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Reliance Ins. Co. v. ArmstrongNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.