Leverone v. Hildreth
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
Suit on promissory note. Defense, want of consideration. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal by defendant from judgment and order denying a new trial.
Appellant, in support of his appeal from the order, contends that the finding of the superior court of a sufficient consideration for the note is wholly unsupported by the evidence.
The facts are, that in 1883 Thomas Hildreth, the father of appellant, executed and delivered to the respondent his promissory note for $2,023. Subsequently, on August 1, *1401885, having made a payment of one thousand dollars on account of this note, he executed and…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Stroud v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Bank of Carrollton, Miss. v. LattingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Pierce v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Pauly v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Wright v. Perry ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.