Legal Opinion
Brookshaw v. South St. Paul Feed, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 4, 1986No. C2-85-1380PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Appellant employee Kenneth Brookshaw claims his discharge from employment with respondent South St. Paul Feed, Inc. was in breach of an implied contract of employment created by distribution of an employee handbook to all employees of South St. Paul Feed. He appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of respondent South St. Paul Feed, Inc. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
FACTS
Appellant Kenneth Brookshaw was employed by respondent South St. Paul Feed, Inc. from 1965 to September 2, 1982, the date of his termination. He was a warehouse…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. RothchildSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dennis R. Pershern v. Fiatallis North America, Inc., Dennis R. Pershern v. Fiatallis North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- John Zaccardi v. Zale Corporation, a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Goodkind v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Matthews v. City of GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
- Lang v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.