Legal Opinion

Heckler v. Kuehner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 5, 1984No. 83-1593PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded to the Court of Appeals to be remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania with instructions to: (1) remand the cases of the named respondents to the Secretary for review pursuant to § 2(d)(2)(C) of the Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act of 1984; (2) make any necessary clarifications in the definition and scope of the class; (3) remand the cases of the unnamed class members to the Secretary for proceedings…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lou J. RANKIN, Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Ernest E. Avery v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  3. Paskel v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. Kuehner v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. State of Maryland v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API