Legal Opinion
Paskel v. Heckler
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 23, 1985No. Nos. 83-1800, 84-1060 and 84-1067PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
I
Ordinarily, disability benefits under either Title II or Title XVI of the Social Security Act will be terminated when the recipient’s medical condition has improved. See Kuzmin v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 1233 (3d Cir.1983). In Section 301 of the Social Security Disability Amendments of 1980, Pub.L. No. 96-265, Title III, § 301, 94 Stat. 441, 449-50 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 425(b), 1383(a)(6) (1982)). Congress provided that recipients of disability benefits who were participating in approved vocational rehabilitation programs could not be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of New York v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- 4 soc.sec.rep.ser. 80, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 15,133 Mario Lopez v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Joan M. Kuzmin v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Foster v. Chesapeake Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Richland Shoe CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Martinez-ZayasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- In Re Continental Airlines, Inc., Debtors, Continental Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Smith v. Fidelity Consumer Discount Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.