Legal Opinion
State v. Saraceno
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 19, 1988No. 5289PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of three counts of sexual assault in the second degree, General Statutes § 53a-71 (a) (1) and two counts of risk of injury to a minor, General Statutes § 53-21. We find error in part.
The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) by failing to grant his motion to separate into individual counts each allegation of a criminal offense, (2) by failing to grant his motion to sever, (3) by failing to grant his repeated requests for a bill of particulars sufficiently specific to enable him to prepare his defense, (4) by…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. AlmedaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. MancinoneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- State v. MulkeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- State v. BrowneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.