Legal Opinion

Haskell v. Raugust

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 19, 1987No. 7798-5-IIIPublished

1Opinion of the Court

McInturff,

C.J.—Donald Haskell, realtor d/b/a Donald R. Haskell Realty, and James Roeber, realtor d/b/a Spokane Industrial Realty, sued Calvin and Leona Raugust, individually and the marital community, and Calvin Raugust d/b/a Skyline Investment Co., Evergreen Trust Co., Progress Development Co., 1 and Cal-Lee, Inc., for real estate commissions due as a result of the sale of property known as the Flour Mill site. The court awarded judgment against Mr. and Mrs. Raugust personally and against the named businesses for $52,500 (6 percent of $875,000) plus prejudgment interest and costs. Mr.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Ostendorf-Morris Co. v. SlymanOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Bennett v. AdamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Kohn v. CohnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Wills v. AlcornMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API