Legal Opinion

Raisner v. Raisner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1929No. 21956. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

These parties were married in Walla Walla, August 19, 1916. They have since continued there to live. They have two children, Ruth Elizabeth, past eleven years, and Ernest Rudolph, past nine years of age. During their marriage, they accumulated com munity property consisting of a home and household furniture in Walla Walla.

On August 3, 1928, respondent filed her complaint for divorce in Walla Walla county, setting forth jurisdictional facts, and further averring that, for two years preceding that time, appellant had treated respondent in a cruel manner in that he used vile names to her in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miller v. SutliffIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. McDougall v. WallingWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Meeker v. WaddleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Banning v. LivesleyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Day v. Fort Scott Investment & Improvement Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doss v. SchullerWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Huseby v. KilgoreWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API