Legal Opinion

Banning v. Livesley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1915No. 12629PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Yakima county, Preble, J., entered October 17, 1914, in favor of the defendants, in an action in tort, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, C. J.

Appeal from a judgment dismissing a cause of action predicated upon an alleged eloignment of hops upon which appellant claimed a landlords’ lien. Appellant is the owner of the land upon which the hops were grown. Respondent Walter Livesley was the lessee, and Robert Livesley is a hop broker who purchased the hops, paying to appellant $1,000 proceeds of the sale of the hops to apply upon the rent, and leaving a balance of $1,000 to become due at a later date, and which not being paid, this action was brought.

The only question involved in the appeal is whether or not Robert Livesley is liable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foxworth v. Brown Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  2. Planters Compress Co. v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Wimp v. EarlyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Cohn v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Farley v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. McEvoy v. Quaker City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Bankston v. BankstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Doss v. SchullerWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Bostock v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API