Robert v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
REVIEW on Certiorari of a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Charles Monroe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Certiorari. Upon trial had in the- justice’s court, petitioner as plaintiff obtained a judgment against the Los Angeles Railway Company, from which it appealed to the superior court. Within five days after the time of serving and filing the notice of appeal, the parties filed with the justice a written document, duly signed, which, after reciting the service and filing by the Railway Company of its notice of appeal and its desire to have the undertaking for costs and that for a stay of execution waived, stated: “Now, therefore, it is hereby stipulated that each and both of said undertakings…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Santom v. BallardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Moyle v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Dalton v. LelandeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Brown v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Li Tai Wing v. FreeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re NowakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- United States Gypsum Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Roberts v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968