Legal Opinion

Li Tai Wing v. Freese

California Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1895No. 15746PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to revoke letters of administration with the will annexed. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

On the 28th of February, A. d. 1894, appellant, Li Tai Wing, filed a petition in the probate court of the city and county of San Francisco, in which, with other allegations, he stated that Li Po Tai died in said city and county, March 20, 1893, testate; that by his will he nominated petitioner and his mother executor and executrix of the will; that at the time of the death of Li Po Tai, and when the will was probated, and letters testamentary were issued to his mother, petitioner was a minor, and was absent from the state of California; that his mother, Lee See, was appointed executrix April…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Estate of PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. In Re the Estate of OlceseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Randall v. PhilbrookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. McDuff v. McDuffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Snyder v. GarrettNevada Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API