State v. Hamdan
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Dissent
SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF JUSTICE
¶ 114. (dissenting). I conclude that Wis. Stat. § 941.23, prohibiting people from going armed with a concealed weapon, is constitutional as written and as applied. The Wisconsin constitution provides that "[t]he *501people have the right to keep and bear arms for security, defense, hunting, recreation or any other lawful purpose."1 I therefore dissent.
¶ 115. The court should not rewrite Wis. Stat. § 941.23 to include exceptions for owners of "privately operated businesses" and persons in their "private residences."2 If Wis. Stat. § 941.23 is unconstitutional…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Aicher Ex Rel. LaBarge v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. BlueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- State v. KesslerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.