United States of America, and v. James Gilbert Hays
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
The opinion in this ease, United States v. Hays, reported at 438 F.2d 538, is withdrawn. The mandate is recalled and the following is substituted therefor as the court’s opinion:
The court adheres to the view that on the merits the case should be affirmed.
As to the motion for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, the order denying the motion for new trial is affirmed.
We hold that the district court does have jurisdiction to deny a motion for new trial without leave of this court during the pendency of an appeal, and that Rule 33, F.R.Cr.P., only requires a remand to grant a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Manuel Sanchez Gallegos v. United States of America, Daniel Howard Johnson v. United States of America, John Franklin Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. John E. Kenny, Trenton P. Oelberg, and William L. Parker, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Wayne Earl EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Robert A. Frame, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Eugene William Clay, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.