Legal Opinion
John Lyle Mead v. California Adult Authority
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 13, 1969No. 23413PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant, a California parolee, appeals from an order of the District Court •denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant contended below and here contends that the appellee’s revocation of his parole violated his constitutional rights because one of the conditions of parole, for violation of which his parole was revoked, was void and because he was not afforded counsel at the time his parole was revoked.
Appellant was released on parole •on December 1, 1967, upon conditions, among others, that he submit monthly reports to his parole officer and that he not enter Marin County,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. BlakemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- James Franklin Dunn v. California Department of Corrections, California Adult Authority, and L. S. Nelson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Woodrow Price Williams v. Wayne K. Patterson, Warden, Colorado State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- In Re ScarboroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
3Cited by19 opinions
- Joseph Menechino v. Russell G. Oswald, as Chairman of the New York State Board of Parole, New Yorkstate Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States Ex Rel. John Bey v. Connecticut State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- John J. Morrissey v. Lou v. Brewer, Warden, G. Donald Booher v. Lee and O'Brien Counties and the State of IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- In Re TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Robert Dorado, on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Henry W. Kerr, Chairman, California Adult Authority, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.