Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1971No. Appeal, 250PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

We are here called upon to determine whether Section 2 of the act providing for the mandatory disposition of detainers lodged against persons imprisoned in any state, county or municipal penal or correctional institution, 1 commonly known as the “180 day rule”, is self-executing. Section 2 2 provides that if the “action” is not brought to trial within the 180 days required by Section l, 3 - the indictment shall be dismissed. We hold that Section 2 operates automatically. The statutory language clearly mandates that after the expiration of the 180-day period, “. .…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. GatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Banks v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. VolkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. RussellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API