Commonwealth v. Bell
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
The appellant, Darryl A. Bell, was convicted by a jury of murder in the first degree. Punishment was fixed at death. Following the denial of a new trial and imposition of sentence in accordance with the jury’s verdict, this appeal was filed. It is urged that serious trial errors were committed which require the grant of a new trial.
The undisputed evidence established that on December 22, 1960, Bell entered a grocery store in the Germantown section of Philadelphia, operated by one Herman Rosenberg, with the intention of committing a robbery. He had a loaded P-38…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. StabinskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Commonwealth v. WoodingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Commonwealth v. DagueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth. v. HossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Lesko v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Commonwealth v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. MoralesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.