Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1965No. Appeal, 292PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

The appellant, Darryl A. Bell, was convicted by a jury of murder in the first degree. Punishment was fixed at death. Following the denial of a new trial and imposition of sentence in accordance with the jury’s verdict, this appeal was filed. It is urged that serious trial errors were committed which require the grant of a new trial.

The undisputed evidence established that on December 22, 1960, Bell entered a grocery store in the Germantown section of Philadelphia, operated by one Herman Rosenberg, with the intention of committing a robbery. He had a loaded P-38…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Commonwealth v. StabinskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Commonwealth v. WoodingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Commonwealth v. DagueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Commonwealth. v. HossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Lesko v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. MoralesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API