United States v. 31.45 ACRES OF LAND, WHITMAN CTY., WASH.
District Court, E.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEILL, Chief Judge.
The Government seeks by a motion in limine to restrict respondents’ evidence at trial as to just compensation. Specif ically, the Government, under the aegis of United States v. Miller, 317 U.S. 369, 63 S.Ct. 276, 87 L.Ed. 336 (1943), asks that respondents be prohibited from including as an element of value of the land herein taken by the Government, any increment in value of such lands attributable to the project for which the lands have been taken.
The project for which lands are being taken is the development of the lower Snake River in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Georgia-Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Arlo C. Crance, J. v. Crance, Ralph O. Crance, Minnie Newport, Rose B. McKeeand Elizabeth MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- New England Fish Co. v. Western Pioneer, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1981
- United States v. 31.43 Acres of Land More or LessCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. 31.43 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Whitman County, State of Washington, United States of America v. 43.50 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Whitman County, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. 13.20 Acres of LandDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1986