Legal Opinion

Howk v. Krotzer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1942No. 28612PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

Counsel are not agreed as to what questions are before this court.

Section 12223-15, General Code, provides:

“When the interest of a party is separate and distinct from that of all others in the suit, and he desires to appeal his part of it, it shall be so allowed by the court, and the penalty and bond fixed accordingly. The-court also shall make such order as to the papers,, pleadings, and copies thereof, and make such other orders as it deems right in view of'a division of the case for an appeal.”

Section 12223-47, General Code, provides in part: “The Supreme Court may make and publish rules,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Damascus Mfg. Co. v. Union Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Chapel State Theatre Co. v. HooperOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. Hughes v. CramerOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  5. King v. L. M. Southern Real Estate Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reliance Universal, Inc. v. Deluth Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. J. G. Laird Lumber Co. v. TeitelbaumOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Balco Corp. v. D. H. Overmyer Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Edgemont Coal & Cement Co. v. GaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Inter-City Equipment Corp. v. MardigianOhio Court of Appeals · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API