Ver Bryck v. Luby
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of defendant after trial before the court without a jury in an action to cancel a deed, plaintiff appeals.
The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to the defendant (respondent), and pursuant to the rules set forth in Estate of Isenberg, 63 Cal.App.2d 214, 216 [146 P.2d 424], the essential facts are:
On April 9, 1943, plaintiff deeded a- parcel of real property in the city of Long Beach to defendant reserving in herself a life estate. The present action was instituted for the purpose of setting aside the deed on the ground that plaintiff was not mentally…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
- Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Mitchell v. TowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Woodcock v. the Petrol Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
3Cited by10 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Utz v. AureguyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- H. F. Ahmanson & Co. v. Salomon Brothers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. CastielCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.