Legal Opinion

DiSalvatore v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1980No. Civ. A. 76-1794PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge.

I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

This case is in a somewhat anomalous posture. It was tried before me without a jury. I made findings of fact to which I applied certain conclusions of law, resulting in a verdict for defendant. Plaintiff moved for a new trial. Following oral argument on the motion, I was persuaded that I had applied an incorrect standard of law. In effect, I had given an erroneous charge to the factfinder and I therefore granted the plaintiffs’ motion. I have now reconsidered the testimony presented in both trials and have reached the conclusions…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  5. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kutner v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Andreassen v. Saf-Gard Safety Shoe Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API