DiSalvatore v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge.
I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
This case is in a somewhat anomalous posture. It was tried before me without a jury. I made findings of fact to which I applied certain conclusions of law, resulting in a verdict for defendant. Plaintiff moved for a new trial. Following oral argument on the motion, I was persuaded that I had applied an incorrect standard of law. In effect, I had given an erroneous charge to the factfinder and I therefore granted the plaintiffs’ motion. I have now reconsidered the testimony presented in both trials and have reached the conclusions…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kutner v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Andreassen v. Saf-Gard Safety Shoe Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2005