Legal Opinion

Andreassen v. Saf-Gard Safety Shoe Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided September 29, 2005No. 0503Published

1Opinion of the Court

QUINONES ALEJANDRO, J,

INTRODUCTION

These above-captioned appeals arise from a jury verdict in a strict products liability civil action, involving “molder’s boots,” in favor of Scott C. Andreassen, plaintiff, and against defendants Saf-Gard Safety Shoe Company Inc., and Weinbrenner Shoe Company Inc., and from this trial judge’s denial of post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. After the filing of these appeals and prior to the submission of this opinion, Weinbrenner Shoe Company reached an out-of-court settlement agreement with plaintiff. Consequently, the appellate issues…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Phillips v. Cricket LightersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API