Perry A. Elchos v. Kevin J. Haas
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partColeman, Justice
¶ 76. I agree with the excellent plurality opinion in all respects save one. ín my opinion, the chancellor considered the issue of estoppel under an erroneous legal standard’." The'issue is subject to a de novo review on appeal, and given the myriad factual issues that must be considered, the case should be remanded for the chancellor to reconsider the issue under the proper legal standard.
¶ 77. The chancellor addressed estoppel in his bench ruling holding that the doctrine of estoppel does not bar the Hasses’ claim solely under Turner v. Morris, 196 Miss. 297, 17 So.2d 205 (1944). The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cook v. FarleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1943
- Bright v. MichelMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
- Perrien v. MappMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
- Martin v. FranklinMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
- Nixon's Heirs v. Cargo's HeirsMississippi Supreme Court · 1854
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.