Legal Opinion

Sears v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1980No. 77-308-CRPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam G. Callow, J.

Following a jury trial, plaintiff in error David Sears (defendant) was convicted of solicitation to commit an act of sexual perversion in violation of secs. 939.30 and 944.17(1), Stats. 1975. The facts supporting the charge and subsequent conviction are not disputed. On October 14, 1976, the defendant, while dressed in women’s clothing, approached a male undercover police officer and offered to perform an act of oral sex in exchange for $20, whereupon the defendant was arrested. A criminal complaint was filed the same day, charging the defendant with solicitation to commit sexual perversion…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. Pablo BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. McFarland v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. BraunsdorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. County of Kenosha v. C & S MANAGEMENT, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. CissellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. HooperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. AnnalaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API