Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Weaver

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 27, 1987No. 18907-7-IPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.

Following commencement of a wrongful death action against Welton Weaver, Continental Casualty Company instituted this declaratory action. The Court granted a summary judgment order that Weaver was not among those persons permitted to drive a car under a rental agreement and that neither Avis nor Continental was obliged to defend or indemnify Weaver for the resultant damages. The Dahlmans appeal, claiming: (1) the driver is a member of the lessee's immediate family and is covered under the rental agreement; (2) denial of insurance coverage to an unlicensed driver is contrary to public policy…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. McDonald Industries, Inc. v. Rollins Leasing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Witherspoon v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Connell v. FranciscoWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Mendoza v. Rivera-ChavezWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Viking Insurance Co. v. HillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  4. Mendoza v. Rivera-ChavezWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Matthews v. Penn-America InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API