Najera v. Bombardieri
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POLLOCK, District Judge.
This action was brought by appellant as plaintiff to recover damages for an alleged assault which was committed upon him by defendant. There was a trial to a jury which resulted in a verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. The parties will be designated as they stood on the record in the court below.
Eleven errors are assigned. One to five, inclusive, relate to the sufficiency of the evidence to uphold the verdict rendered; six and seven, to the refusal of the trial court to admit certain evidence inquired of by counsel for plaintiff; eight to ten, errors…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States Smelting Co. v. ParryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Phoenix Railway Co. v. LandisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Liberty Bell Gold Mining Co. v. Smuggler-Union Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Slip Scarf Co. v. Wm. Filene's Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923
- National Biscuit Co. v. LitzkyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. DoerksenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Zahn v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Bass v. DehnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Abbott v. FantDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
- Shepard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933