Legal Opinion

Petkovits v. Huessy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1923No. 17987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

— The basis of tbe plaintiff’s suit was a written trust agreement, executed by bimself and Ferdinand Hocbbrunn, of Seattle, dated February 21, 1903. Tbe substance of tbis agreement was that Hochbrunn held tbe legal title to certain real estate in King county, Washington, in trust for tbe plaintiff, and that, when tbe property should be sold, tbe plaintiff, out of tbe proceeds of tbe sale, should- first receive $21,000, tbe purchase price paid by him, and that Hocbbrunn should next be reimbursed for any sums be might have paid for taxes, etc., and tbe balance should be equally divided between…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Union Machinery & Supply Co. v. DarnellWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Morris v. Healy Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Wright v. StewartWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Erfurth v. ErfurthWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Parke v. CaseWashington Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Schnitzer v. Panhandle Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API