Legal Opinion

Madron v. Thomson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1966PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

A truck and trailer, together with the cargo thereon, belonging to the plaintiffs Madron were damaged by fire. The plaintiff insurance companies paid the Madrons a part of the loss pursuant to fire insurance policies issued to the Madrons. The defendants are a service station operator, Thomson, and his employee, Riley. Plaintiffs contend the fire was caused by defendants’ negligence. The trial court directed the jury to return a verdict in favor of both defendants. Plaintiffs appeal.

The plaintiffs charged that the defendants were negligent in two particulars:

“(1) In endeavoring to fill and in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Mayor v. DowsettOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Gossett v. SimonsonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Eckleberry v. Kaiser Foundation Northern HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Branch v. DempseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United Pacific Insurance Co. v. Truck Ins. Exch.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Big MacK Trucking Company, Inc. v. DickersonTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Oregon v. DerryberryOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Palmore v. Kirkman Laboratories, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Missouri State Highway Commission v. Howard Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API