Hipp v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was charged with playing cards in a certain named pasture, and on his trial was convicted and fined $10.
The indictment is sufficient. Russell v. State, 44 Texas Crim. Rep., 465; Hankins v. State, 6 Texas Ct. Rep., 790.
Articles 379 and 381, Acts of 1901, page 26, punish all character of gaming “at any place except a private residence' occupied by a family.” Article 381 provides that it is not necessary to prove betting occurred upon any of these games where the card playing occurred at a house for retailing spirituous liquors, etc., or in any street, highway…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HolbrookOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Pugh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Purvis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Gallegos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.