Legal Opinion

Hipp v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 3, 1903No. 2428PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with playing cards in a certain named pasture, and on his trial was convicted and fined $10.

The indictment is sufficient. Russell v. State, 44 Texas Crim. Rep., 465; Hankins v. State, 6 Texas Ct. Rep., 790.

Articles 379 and 381, Acts of 1901, page 26, punish all character of gaming “at any place except a private residence' occupied by a family.” Article 381 provides that it is not necessary to prove betting occurred upon any of these games where the card playing occurred at a house for retailing spirituous liquors, etc., or in any street, highway…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HolbrookOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Pugh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Purvis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Gallegos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API