Legal Opinion

Russell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 11, 1903No. 2600PublishedCited by 2 opinions

No statement required.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Pkesiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with playing at a game with cards, which said game of cards was not played at a private residence occupied by a family. The first two grounds of the motion to quash are in the nature of general demurrers, alleging that the complaint and information are vague and indefinite, and insufficient to set forth the offense. It is contended that neither the complaint nor information affirmatively allege that defendant played at a game of cards at any place in Somervell County where card playing is prohibited. If it was intended by this criticism to say…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Hipp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API