Pugh v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of being drunk in a public place.
The facts, without dispute, show that if appellant was drunk it was at the private residence of Charlev Knox. The facts further show, without dispute, that Knox resided about five miles east of the town of Breckenridge; that on the night of the first of February, 1907, Knox and his wife gave an entertainment to a few friends, and only to those who were invited. It was an exclusive affair, and confined only to those invited. Among the families in* vited were those of Mr. Goodwin and Mr. Pugh, father of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hipp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Bordeaux v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
- Gomprecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Terry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Douglas Earl FosslerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Warrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- United States v. LoweUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- Commander v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Nixon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.