Gadberry v. Hutchinson Egg Case Filler Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Reno district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
*73The opinion of the court was delivered by
Porter, J.:
In an action under the workmen’s compensation law, plaintiff recovered judgment, and defendant appeals.
Plaintiff was in the employ of the Hutchinson Egg Case Filler Company; that company and the Hutchinson Box Board and Paper Company occupied adjoining tracts of land, upon which their factories were located, a space of about, sixty feet separating their main buildings. At each factory there was a platform dock, and these were connected by a runway -over which strawboard and other material used in the egg case fil,ler factory were conveyed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bevard v. Skidmore-Patterson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- O'Neal v. BainbridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Hicks ex rel. Hicks v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Cain v. National Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Bundy v. Petroleum Products Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1918
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williams v. HannaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Iott v. MosbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Mathis v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Wise v. Central Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Alvarado v. Flower Bros. Rock Crusher Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921