Legal Opinion

Suhor v. Gusse

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1978No. 9520PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEER, Judge.

Though a number of issues are fairly stated and vigorously argued by able counsel for appellant, such contentions may be essentially mooted and, for all practical purposes, obviated by a finding on our part that the quantum awarded by the jury (and sustained by the trial judge’s refusal to grant an additur) does not constitute an abuse of the trial court’s discretion.

Accordingly, we turn first to that consideration.

Mr. Suhor experienced a back injury in a typical rear-end automobile collision, and appellee’s legal responsibility for the damages incurred is not at issue here.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  3. Ashley v. Nissan Motor Corp. in USALouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Watts v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Domingue v. Continental Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Suhor v. GusseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  2. Suhor v. GusseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Suhor v. GusseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  4. Webb v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  5. Webb v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API