Legal Opinion

Webb v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 20, 1996No. 93-501Published

1Opinion of the Court

692 A.2d 343 (1996)

Bruce and Martha WEBB,

v.

NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION.

No. 93-501.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

December 20, 1996.

Motion for Reargument Denied January 3, 1997.

A. Gregory Rainville of Farrar & Rainville and Michael Rose (on the brief), St. Albans, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Samuel Hoar, Jr. of Dinse, Erdmann & Clapp, Burlington, and John A. Rupp and Ann L. Gibson of Coffield, Ungaretti & Harris, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Peter B. Joslin and John Davis Buckley of Theriault & Joslin, P.C., Montpelier, and Victor E. Schwartz, Mark A. Behrens and David…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API