Webb v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1DissentJohnson, J.
Although there are three votes in this Court for reversal of the judgment below, the differences among the members of the majority are such that there is no direction to the trial court on how to proceed. Justice Dooley would remand with instructions to charge the jury on a theory of “pure” comparison; Justice Morse would remand with instructions to charge on the theory of comparative negligence (sometimes characterized as “half or nothing”) embodied in 12 V.S.A. § 1036; and Justice Peck would reverse because no form of comparative negligence was charged, but without any direction on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Correia v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Lippard v. Houdaille Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Kimco Development Corp. v. Michael D'S Carpet Outlets & Laramie Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.