Diediker v. Peelle Financial Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARON, J.
This case derives from the actions of a title insurance company which issued a policy insuring title to a property without excepting an Internal Revenue Service lien despite its knowledge of the lien’s existence. The insurance company now seeks to recover the amount eventually paid to the IRS on behalf of its policyholder from the trustee who, lacking knowledge of the existence of the lien, conducted a foreclosure sale years earlier without notifying the IRS. The policyholder joins in the suit against the trustee. The central issue raised is whether the trustee is “required”…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
- I. E. Associates v. Safeco Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Blankenheim v. E. F. Hutton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc. v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- OCM Principal Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. CIBC World Markets Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Residential Capital, LLC v. CAL-WESTERNRE CONVEYANCE CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Turner v. Seterus, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Pacific Insurance v. KentDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
- Heritage Oaks Partners v. First American Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.