Legal Opinion
Turner v. Seterus, Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided September 24, 2018No. C079613PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobie, Acting P. J.
*520In this wrongful foreclosure case, plaintiffs Amy Arlene Turner and Joseph Zeleny sought damages from defendant Seterus, Inc. (Seterus) on the theory that Seterus had "frustrated [their] lawful attempt, pursuant to [Civil] Code [section] 2924c, to cure their default more than five days prior to the noticed foreclosure sale." The trial court sustained Seterus's demurrer to their third amended complaint without leave to amend.
On appeal, plaintiffs contend the trial court erred. We agree in part and reverse the judgment with instructions to the trial court to vacate its order sustaining…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Nymark v. Heart Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Summers v. Colette, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Citrus El Dorado, LLC v. Chi. Title Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.