Legal Opinion

U.S. Philips Corp. v. International Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 21, 2005No. 2004-1361PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

U.S. Philips Corporation appeals from a final order of the United States International Trade Commission, in which the Commission held six of Philips’s patents for the manufacture of compact discs to be unenforceable because of patent misuse. The Commission ruled that Philips had employed an impermissible tying arrangement because it required prospective licensees to license packages of patents rather than allowing them to choose which individual patents they wished to license and making the licensing fee correspond to the particular patents designated by the licensees.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Transcore v. Electronic Transaction Consultants Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. Monsanto Company v. ScruggsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Princo Corp. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  4. In Re Princo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  5. Sprint Communications Company L.P., v. Vonage Holdings Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API