Fox v. Arizona, State of
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Marcella Fox, No. CV-21-01089-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 State of Arizona, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s and the State of Arizona’s Joint Statement 16 of Discovery Dispute (Doc. 74) and supplemental briefing (Docs. 79, 86), Defendant 17 McClelland’s Motion for Mental Examination of Plaintiff (Doc. 75), Brittany Fountain and 18 Kysha Slocumb’s Objections and Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoenas (Doc. 88), 19 Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- William Partridge James Zagorski William Stojack v. Robert B. Reich Helen Haase U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Or.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.