Legal Opinion

Foto Fair International, Inc. v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1982No. 82-64PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant, in its notice of appeal submitted to the board, specifically objected to the assessment arguing the kiosks are exempt from sales tax pursuant to the “direct use” exemption contained in R.C. 5739.01(E)(2).2 Following the reasoning expressed by the commissioner the board made two findings. First, the board determined the kiosks were affixed to realty and, therefore, they became realty. This reasoning is predicated upon our holding in Shutter Bug v. Kosydar (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 99 [69 O.O.2d 487]. Second, the board reasoned that appellant is a construction contractor arid, as such,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Citizens Financial Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. 3535 Salem Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Shutter Bug, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Botkins Grain & Feed Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Watchmakers-Clockmakers Institute, Inc. v. TracyOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API