Legal Opinion
Pingleton v. Shepherd
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 29, 1951No. 4-9569PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The appellants herein, plaintiffs in the Circuit Court, are engaged in the automobile business in St. Louis, Missouri. They filed suit in the Clark Circuit Court to replevy an automobile which they had sold to one, Jack Wortham, who gave them a check in payment of the purchase price, representing the check to be good, when, as a matter of fact, it was worthless.
The appellee, Shepherd, is in the automobile business at Arkadelphia, Arkansas, and bought the car in question from Wortham at Mauldings’ Auto Auction in North Little Rock, Arkansas. It developed that the automobile had been originally…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Snyder v. LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Island Trading Co. v. Berg BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Keegan v. Kaufman Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Parr v. HelfrichNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Island Trading Co. v. Berg Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
3Cited by9 opinions
- Midway Auto Sales, Inc. v. ClarksonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Guckeen Farmers Elevator Co. v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Aclin v. Manhattan Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Boyd Adams, D/B/A Boyd Adams Livestock Commission Company, and Western Casualty and Surety Company v. Willis Greeson, D/B/A Montgomery County AuctionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Boyd Adams, D/B/A Boyd Adams Livestock Commission Company, and Western Casualty and Surety Company v. Willis Greeson, D/B/A Montgomery County Auction, Boyd Adams, D/B/A Boyd Adams Livestock Commission Company, and Western Casualty and Surety Company v. Hiram Wall, D/B/A Hiram Wall Sales CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.