Legal Opinion
Duran-Ballen v. Duran-Ballen
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBernstein, J.
The plaintiff has. brought this action for a judgment declaring that the decree of divorce obtained by the defendant against her in the courts of the State of Chihuahua, Republic of Mexico, on November 18, 1942, is invalid and that she is still the defendant’s lawful wife.
The proof adduced upon the trial disclosed that the plaintiff, a citizen of the United States, married the defendant, a citizen of the Republic of Ecuador, in the city of New York on June 4, 1936, and resided there with him until June 25, 1942; that on the latter date she separated from him pursuant to an agreement which,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Ohio Ex Rel. Popovici v. AglerSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Simms v. SimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Baumann v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anonymous v. AnonymousNew York City Family Court · 1964
- Salvatierra v. CalderonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002