Legal Opinion
Hargis v. Hargis
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 1931No. 22217. En BancPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing.
Holcomb, J.
Upon a reheating En Banc being granted in this case, which was decided and reported in Hargis v. Hargis, 157 Wash. 251, 288 Pac. 664, upon the submission of the case on rehearing in the oral argument and by printed statement, appellant confined her claim for a reversal strictly as respecting the decision in favor of the Hargis Bank & Trust Company as intervener, waiving all questions as to the adjudication regarding all other interveners.
A further intensive study has been given the entire record in this cause upon this question.
Appellant insists that, the community or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Katterhagen v. MeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Finn v. FinnWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- State ex rel. Winston v. MorrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- In Re Carmack's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Snyder v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Puget Mill Co. v. KerryWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Seaton v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Woods v. NaimyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Piles v. BoveeWashington Supreme Court · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.