Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Wells Fargo

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided September 30, 2025No. 4:16-cv-00394Unknown

1Opinion

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex § rel. MICHAEL J. FISHER, et al., § § Plaintiffs/Relators, § Civil Action No. 4:16-cv-00394 v. § Judge Mazzant § WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #60). Having considered the Motion, the relevant pleadings, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. BACKGROUND This is a case involving a qui tam action. The Second…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lone Star Fund v (U.S.), L.P. v. Barclays Bank PLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  4. Gonzalez v. KayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API