Legal Opinion

MacDougall v. Board of Land Com'rs.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1935No. 1911PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Justice.

On December 8, 1933, the Board of Land Commissioners of this state, as party of the first part, entered into a contract with Shepard-Pendleton & Company, as party of the second part, sometimes herein referred to as the auditing company, for the investigation, etc., of certain debts thought to be due to the state under oil, gas and other mineral leases, the contract reciting that it is the desire of the state to employ the auditing company to ascertain whether true and accurate ac-countings have been made to it, and “whether the methods used in ascertaining the quantity and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. SnyderWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State ex rel. Henderson v. BurdickWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Gibson v. KayOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Lewis v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Lingo-Leeper Lumber Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Frazier v. State by and Through PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Union Pacific Resources Co. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Allred v. BeboutWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. UnderwoodWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Mariano & Assoc., PC v. Board of County Com'rs of Sublette CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API