Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1959No. 41,572PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

The primary, or basic, suit involved in this appeal is one for divorce, but the question before us relates to the status of plaintiff’s attorney and his authority to represent plaintiff as such in the domestic relations matter. The trial court ordered that plaintiff’s attorney, pursuant to this court’s amended rules No. 41 and No. 54, was required to obtain local counsel and further ordered that unless he did so within a certain time, the petition and other pleadings and orders would be stricken. Plaintiff’s attorney failed and refused to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Depew v. Wichita Ass'n of Credit MenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. In re PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Fouts v. Armstrong Commercial Laundry Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  3. Thornburg v. McClellandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. In Re PlattSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. Rafferty v. Land O'Lakes, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API