Legal Opinion

Thornburg v. McClelland

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 23, 1960No. 41,569PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Jackson, J.:

In this appeal, we again have a question of the construction and application of the provisions of G. S. 1949, 7-104 relating to the practice of law by nonresident attorneys before the courts and administrative bodies of this state. The plaintiff’s petition in her action against the defendants was stricken by the district court because of alleged failure to comply with the above section of the statute and plaintiff appeals from that order. It should be noticed in this case, the question of the statute of limitations is plainly in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bradley v. SudlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  2. Bradley v. SudlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  3. Felton v. RubowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Dyche v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fouts v. Armstrong Commercial Laundry Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. Architectural & Engineered Products Co. v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  3. Goldsberry v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Biczo v. RosiakShenandoah County Circuit Court · 1986
  5. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API