Legal Opinion · Dissent
Price v. District of Columbia Board of Ethics and Government Accountability
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 25, 2019No. 16-AA-1230Published
1DissentEasterly, Associate Judge
"The parties agree that the proceeding before the Ethics Board was a 'contested case.' " Ante at 844. The District of Columbia Administrative Procedure Act (DCAPA) provides that "[a]ny person suffering a legal wrong, or adversely affected or aggrieved, by an order or decision of the Mayor or an agency in a contested case , is entitled to a judicial review thereof in accordance with this subchapter upon filing in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals a written petition for review." D.C. Code § 2-510(a) (emphasis added). The Court Reorganization Act, specifically D.C. Code § 11-722(1),…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Capitol Hill Restoration Society, Inc. v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Marijuana Policy Project v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Mathis v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- District of Columbia v. SullivanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.