Legal Opinion
Howard v. Lufkin
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1988No. A039913PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MERRILL, J.
Plaintiff Mort Howard (Howard) filed an appeal from a judgment of declaratory relief respecting a written contract and from an order denying his motion to vacate the judgment. Defendants Terry Lufkin and James Howard (collectively referred to as Lufkin) moved to dismiss Howard’s appeal, contending that the notice of appeal from the judgment was not timely filed and that no appeal lies from the order denying the motion to vacate the judgment. We have determined that while Howard’s appeal from the judgment must be dismissed for untimely filing, his appeal from the order…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Berkeley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Forman v. Knapp PressCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Eben-King v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- JADE K. v. ViguriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Ryan v. RosenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Gallup v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Lippman v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.