Legal Opinion
United States v. Bigalk
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 28, 2009No. Civil 08-817(JNE/SRN)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge.
The United States of America brought suit against Kathryn Bigalk, Kim Bigalk, Todd Bigalk, Terry Bigalk, Arnold Bigalk, the personal representative of the estate of Kenneth Bigalk, the trustee for K & K Limited Trust (K & K), Crosby & Associates, Robert Manseau, Jean Manseau, Marvin Pullman, Lorraine Pullman, and the estate of Winfield Bender to foreclose on federal tax liens encumbering real property in Fillmore County, Minnesota. The government seeks a decree that Kenneth and Kathryn Bigalk, a married couple, fraudulently conveyed the real property…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rubenstein v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2010
- City Of Chicago v. Equte LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023