Legal Opinion
Pavlick v. Meriden Trust & Safe Deposit Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 26, 1953PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
The plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court from a decree of the Probate Court for the district of Meriden ordering the distribution of the net estate of William V. Pavlicek in equal shares to the three beneficiaries named in the residuary clause of his will. These beneficiaries, Vincent Pavlicek, Maria Vitovec and Frantiska Roubec, all residents of Czechoslovakia, will be referred to as the defendants. The appeal was made returnable to the first Tuesday of February, 1952. On February 13, the defendants filed a general appearance, and on the same day the plaintiff filed his reasons of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Palmer v. ReevesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Fuller v. MarvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Orcutt's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- Angus v. NobleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Weidlich v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hartford Kosher Caterers, Inc. v. GazdaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- LaBow v. LaBowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Maloney v. TaplinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Kuser v. OrkisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Baldwin v. Tradesmens National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.